Learn More

Designing green, building green, living green.
Using more wood in buildings helps keep us on the path toward a sustainable future.
Green Building: Materials and Resources
Green building programs that include a "materials and resources" category consider it beneficial to the environment if the material or resource:
• Reduces construction waste or uses advanced framing techniques
• Uses salvaged, refurbished or reused materials
• Uses materials with recycled content, such as engineered wood products
• Uses local or regional materials, sometimes with a distance limit
• Uses renewable materials
• Has third party certification of the material's sustainability
• Is determined to be environmentally preferable
• Uses salvaged, refurbished or reused materials
• Uses materials with recycled content, such as engineered wood products
• Uses local or regional materials, sometimes with a distance limit
• Uses renewable materials
• Has third party certification of the material's sustainability
• Is determined to be environmentally preferable
A green building program that cannot accurately distinguish low environmental impact products from high impact products, but that nonetheless encourages the use of some products over others, is green in name only.
What are green rating tools?
![]() |
|
These are tools used to assess the greenness of a building take into
consideration some or all of these environmentally related categories:
• Sustainable sites • Water efficiency • Energy and atmosphere • Materials and resources • Indoor air quality • Innovation and design process • Location and linkages • Homeowner awareness |
Building codes and standards vs rating programs
In Canada, buildings are designed according to a code – either a provincial building code, or a recent version of one of Canada’s national codes adopted by regulation in a province or territory.Codes are legislated requirements that describe building safety and performance. Rating systems are an additional approach, following goals for energy efficiency, interior air quality, water conservation and other sustainability criteria. This framework may use a checklist, software tools, consensus standards and certain named attributes.
Ratings are voluntary unless they are adopted by an authority with jurisdiction or have not yet been referenced in any code, in any country.
Upcoming green codes and standards
• Model National Energy Code for Buildings of CanadaNext edition of the MNECB scheduled for 2011.
Read more at www.nationalcodes.ca
• US National Green Building ANSI Standard:
Residential, NAHB / ICC
Read more at www.nahb.org
• US Green Building Assessment Protocol for Commercial Buildings
(ANSI Standard 01-2008P)
Read more: www.thegbi.org
ISO 14000 and ISO 26000
The 14000 series of standards from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provides a roadmap to organizing to achieve environmental responsibility. A new series of standards now under development will provide guidance to the private sector, government, and all other segments of society regarding social responsibility. The new set of standards, identified as the ISO 26000 series, is currently in draft form and available for public comment and discussion. Implementation is slated for 2010.More on green rating systems
Going green does not mean you need to pick one rating system fully. Many rating tools provide excellent ideas for better, higher performance, environmentally responsible designs. One option is to use one or more rating tools as a checklist only, saving on the administration fees while ensuring that the finished building meets the goals and expectations required.Two examples of this strategy are:
• Gardiner Public School, ON, Sep 2008
• Ripple Rock Elementary School, BC, Feb 2007
There is a growing concern that some buildings will not perform as expected because rating systems deal only with the design, and not with the performance of the structure once complete. Concern over lawsuits from owners of buildings with energy consumption much higher than expected is expressed in:
• Liability Exposure in Green Building, CHBA 2008
• Legal Risks of Green Building, Custom Home 2008
• Don't let Green Design Cause Red Ink, AIA 2007
Here is an article that can stimulate thoughts on a better way to rate green buildings:
• A Better Way to Rate Green Buildings, Building Science 2008


